Page 116 - Teaching Innovation for the 21st Century

114
Teaching Innovation for the 21st Century | Showcasing UJ Teaching and Learning 2021
Conclusion
3D-printed models are used to supplement the learning experience for practical anatomy content. These models can be used as interactive remote learning tools and can also supplement human tissue scarcity within the teaching laboratory. Remote learning with 3D-printed models will allow students to practice appropriate visuo-spatial orientation, undertake active learning by interacting with the model using coloured markers or paint and assembling larger structures from individual components, and have access to optimal learning tools for remote learning and laboratory revision.
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank Mr R. Strauss from Makerspace, DFC for the assistance with printing the prototype models, creating the skull puzzle and general brainstorming around 3D printing.
References
Adams, J.W., Paxton, L., Dawes, K., Burlak, K., Quayle, M. & McMenamin, P.G. 2015. ‘3D printed reproductions of orbital dissections: A novel mode of visualising anatomy for trainees in opthalmology or optometry’. British Journal of Opthalmology, 99: 1162–1167. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-306189.
Awadh, A.B., Clark, J., Clowry, G. & Keenan, I.D. 2022. ‘Multimodal three-dimensional visualization enhances novice learner interpretation of basic cross-sectional anatomy’. Anatomical Sciences Education, 15(1): 127–142. doi: 10.1002/ase.2045.
Codd, A.M. & Choudhury, B. 2011. ‘Virtual reality anatomy: Is it comparable with traditional methods in the teaching of human forearm musculoskeltal anatomy?’. Anatomical Sciences Education, 4: 119–125. doi: 10.1002/ase.214.
Fellner, F.A., Engel, K. & Kremer, C. 2017. ‘Virtual anatomy: The dissecting theatre of the future - Implementation of cinematic rendering in a large 8K high-resolution projection environment’. Journal of Biomedical Sciences and Engineering, 10: 367–375. doi: 10.4236/jbise.2017.108028.
Garg, A. X., Norman, G. & Sperotable, L. 2001. ‘How medical students learn spatial anatomy’. The Lancet, 357(9253): 363–364. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03649-7.
Guillot, A., Champely, S., Batier, C., Thiriet, P. & Collet, C. .2007. ‘Relationship between spatial abilities, mental rotation and functional anatomy learning’. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 12: 491–507. doi: 10.1007/s10459-006-9021-7.
Huitt, T.W., Killins, A. & Brooks, W.S. 2015. ‘Team-based learning in the gross anatomy laboratory improves academic performance and students’ attitudes toward teamwork’. Anatomical Sciences Education, 8(2): 95–103. doi: 10.1002/ase.1460.
Isbell, J.A., Makeeva, V., Caruthers, K. & Brooks, W.S. 2016. ‘The impact of team-based learning (TBL) on physician assistant students’ academic performance in gross anatomy’. The Journal of Physician Assistant Education, 27(3): 126–130. doi: 10.1097/JPA.0000000000000082.
Jones, D.G. 1998. ‘Reassessing the importance of dissection: A critique and elaboration’. Clinical Anatomy, 10: 123–127. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2353(1997)10:2<123::AID-CA9>3.0.CO;2-W.