Balancing efficiency and human connection The tension between efficiency and humanity lies at the heart of contemporary supervision. Universities often demand faster completions, while students desire timely feedback and structured support. Tools, training, and technology can improve efficiency, but supervision cannot be reduced to a checklist. Ferhana’s reflection: As a current doctoral student, I find that meaningful supervision is rooted in the relationship between the supervisor and the student. Trust, empathy, and genuine care create an environment where students feel safe to take risks, make mistakes, and grow as independent researchers. I believe the essence of supervision lies in knowing when to push, support, and step back. While efficiency can help students complete their degrees, it is the human connection that, in my opinion, ensures that graduates emerge with a strong sense of identity and purpose as scholars. The art of supervision If supervision were only about imparting knowledge, it could be taught as a subject. However, supervision is more complex: it is a craft shaped by experience, reflection, and relationships. Like any art form, it requires intuition, patience, and adaptability. Suzy’s reflection: In almost 20 years of supervision, I have experienced an evolving supervision landscape. We have traditional one-on-one supervision, dominant especially in humanities and social sciences, and often involves a close apprenticeship relationship between supervisor and student. However, this model can sometimes present challenges such as power dynamics and limited perspectives. Collaborative models have grown in popularity worldwide, including supervision panels or committees, cohort or team supervision, and project-based approaches. These models provide multiple sources of feedback, peer support, and exposure to a broader research culture, which enhances scholarly development and sustains supervision even if some members leave. Effective supervision usually progresses through stages, such as foundations (matching student and project, planning), momentum (regular contact, feedback, motivation), and final stages (career support, research presentation). Supervision involves intensive teaching and guidance to develop the student’s research skills and academic knowledge. Student support in supervision is multifaceted, including academic (research methodology, writing), emotional, and structural support. Successful supervision often aims not only at knowledge transfer but also at fostering independence, critical thinking, and motivation in students (Karampelias et al., 2024). Common good practices involve negotiated supervisory agreements, regular meetings and feedback, encouragement of early and frequent writing, involvement in academic communities, and preparation for research dissemination. My own practice has become more intentionally tailored to these levels, guided by both the scholarship and my lived experiences. What remains constant is my belief that supervision is not just a responsibility but a profound privilege - one that allows me to shape, and be shaped by, the next generation of scholars. The tension between efficiency and humanity lies at the heart of contemporary supervision. 75 A Journey of Innovation
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjU1NDYx