Introduction As UJ marks two decades of pedagogical innovation, gamification has emerged as a particularly transformative tool within STEM education. This reflective paper examines the integration of Kahoot (https://kahoot.com) and Quizizz (https:// quizizz.com/?lng=en) within third-year Molecular Biology and Molecular Physiology modules, exploring how these digital platforms have reshaped student engagement and learning outcomes. Grounded in established educational theories—particularly active learning principles (Freeman et al., 2014) and self-determination theory (Ryan & Deci, 2000)—this reflection draws upon mixed-methods student feedback to evaluate the alignment of gamified learning approaches with UJ’s strategic commitment to inclusive, innovative pedagogy. The present-day STEM teaching space frequently faces student passivity and a reluctance to engage with cognitively demanding theoretical content, compounded by difficulties interpreting abstract concepts and applying theoretical knowledge to practical contexts. A persistent barrier emerged within my teaching practice in Molecular Biology and Molecular Physiology: students consistently hesitated to participate actively, constrained by fear of providing incorrect responses or experiencing public embarrassment. This reluctance significantly hindered their comprehension of intricate molecular processes and created an atmosphere where learning remained frustratingly superficial. These observations catalysed a deliberate pedagogical transformation, leading to the strategic integration of gamified realtime assessment tools that would ultimately reshape my teaching methodology and students’ learning journeys and outcomes. Pedagogical context and initial challenges My initial teaching approach for these complex modules relied heavily on traditional lecture formats utilising PowerPoint presentations, supplemented by visual aids and prescribed textbook readings. Whilst academically rigorous, this methodology inadvertently cultivated a predominantly passive learning environment. Students typically absorbed information silently, deferring questions until after class, during one-on-one consultations, or avoiding them entirely. Gauging real-time comprehension of complex concepts, such as genetic regulation pathways or physiological feedback mechanisms, proved consistently challenging. The inherent complexity of molecular biology content and the intense pressure often found in university academic environments, particularly at the thirdyear exit level, exacerbated student apprehension. Despite obvious intellectual capability, many students appeared paralysed by the prospect of being incorrect, resulting in less immediate participation and demotivation. What I suspected was only superficial conceptual understanding. 19 A Journey of Innovation
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjU1NDYx